MUET logo

Liquefaction Hazard Assessment with Integrated Deterministic and Performance-Based Approach for Coastal Megacities: A Case Study of Karachi, Pakistan

Authors

  • Lal Chand Marwari

    Civil Engineering Department, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76060 Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Aneel Kumar

    Civil Engineering Department, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76060 Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Zaheer Ahmad Almani

    Civil Engineering Department, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76060 Sindh, Pakistan
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22581/0958

Keywords:

Liquefaction, Urban Resilience, PLAXIS 3D , Numerical Modeling , UBC3D-PLM

Abstract

This research investigates liquefaction hazard assessment in Karachi, the economic hub of Pakistan. Karachi's coastal region is increasingly vulnerable to liquefaction-related hazards, which pose a significant threat to the city's seismic resilience. Rapid, unplanned urbanization and increasing earthquake risk in this densely populated area underscore the critical need for a comprehensive assessment of liquefaction hazard, which remains largely unquantified in existing local research. In this research, a comprehensive assessment of liquefaction potential is provided for the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Phase-VIII Karachi using a comprehensive framework. The initial geotechnical characterization identifies Holocene silty sand deposits (SM) with a relative density of 38\% and a shallow water table within 3 meters of the ground surface. Recent seismic hazard analysis, both probabilistic and deterministic, suggests that Karachi could experience a maximum PGA as high as 0.99g in some areas. The liquefaction potential was evaluated using advanced 3D finite element modeling in PLAXIS 3D software with the UBC3D-PLM Model, alongside an empirical simplified procedure. The simplified procedure consistently yields a Factor of Safety (FS) less than unity throughout the 9.14~m soil depth in both sand and silt layers, indicating high susceptibility of the coastal soil to liquefaction. Numerical modeling in PLAXIS 3D confirms these findings, showing a rapid increase in the pore water pressure ratio ($r_u$) to unity, with loss of soil strength and stiffness due to reduced effective stress. The soil is completely liquefied, with vertical settlement up to 0.125~m under a load of 100~kN/m\textsuperscript{2}. The research concludes that current infrastructure along the coastal belt of Karachi requires urgent geotechnical intervention, such as jet grouting or deep foundation transfer, to mitigate the catastrophic potential of seismically induced soil instability.

Downloads

References

[1] M. Waseem, M. A. Khan, and S. Khan, “Seismic sources for southern Pakistan and seismic hazard assessment of Karachi,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 511–536, 2019.

[2] T. Zahra and Y. Zehra, “Effect of Rising Seismic Risk on the Design of High Rise Buildings in Karachi,” Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. IJCEE-IJENS, vol. 12, no. 06, pp. 42–45, 2012.

[3] S. S. Bukhary, S. Muhammad, and A. Abdi, “Seismic liquefaction susceptibility and ground deformation evaluation using geotechnical characterization,” J. Xi’an Shiyou Univ., Nat. Sci. Ed., vol. 20, pp. 197–213, July 2024.

[4] M. Singh, S. Singh, and R. Shakya, “Mitigating liquefaction risks for buildings on circular footings: a numerical modeling approach,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2024.

[5] Z. Saeed, A. Khan, S. A. Khan, and S. W. Haider, “Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential in Defence Housing Authority, Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential in Defence Housing Authority,” Feb. 2017.

[6] E. Mongold, J. Sobers, and J. W. Baker, “Regional seismic risk assessment including liquefaction and sea level rise,” in 18th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., pp. 1–9, 2024.

[7] O. Tirmizi, S. D. Khan, S. Mirzaee, and H. Fattahi, “Hazard Potential in Southern Pakistan: A Study on the Subsidence and Neotectonics of Karachi and Surrounding Areas,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 5, 2023.

[8] P. Bassal, E. Papageorgiou, D. M. Moug, J. D. Bray, K. O. Cetin, A. Şahin, E. J. Kubatko, S. Nepal, C. Toth, S. B. Kendır, and M. Bikçe, “Liquefaction ground deformations and cascading coastal flood hazard in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 40, pp. 1845– 1869, Aug. 2024.

[9] S. Kanwal, X. Ding, S. Wu, and M. Sajjad, “Vertical Ground Displacements and Its Impact on Erosion along the Karachi Coastline, Pakistan,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 9, 2022.

[10] S. H. Lodi, W. Sultan, S. S. Bukhary, and S. F. A. Rafeeqi, “Liquefaction potential along the coastal regions of Karachi,” J. Himal. Earth Sci., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2015.

[11] R. Bilham, S. Lodi, S. Hough, S. Bukhary, A. M. Khan, and S. F. A. Rafeeqi, “Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: Uncertain past, uncertain future,” Seismol. Res. Lett., vol. 78, pp. 601–613, Nov./Dec. 2007.

[12] “July–October 2005, Karachi Metropolitan Area Earthquake Swarm (Sindh), Pakistan.” ASC. Accessed: Sep. 11, 2025.

[13] M. Q. Mirza, Y. Bashir, and S. H. Ali, “Application of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for earthquake hazard: Case study of Karachi City, Pakistan,” J. Earth Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–33, 2024.

[14] M. K. Ertek, G. Demir, K. Haciefendioglu, and S. B. Ikizler, “Evaluation of liquefaction potential of a coastal region in Atakum,” in World Congr. Civil, Struct. Environ. Eng., pp. 1–8, 2016.

[15] J. P. Zachariah and R. S. Jakka, “State-of-the-art review on utilization of waste materials in the mitigation of soil liquefaction,” Indian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 54, pp. 837–856, June 2024.

[16] R. Saikia and M. Chetia, “Critical review on the parameters influencing liquefaction of soils,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 110–116, 2014.

[17] M. Ahmad, X. W. Tang, F. Ahmad, and A. Jamal, “Assessment of soil liquefaction potential in Kamra, Pakistan,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–16, 2018.

[18] R. Sukkarak, W. Tanapalungkorn, S. Likitlersuang, and K. Ueda, “Liquefaction analysis of sandy soil during strong earthquake in Northern Thailand,” Soils Found., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1302–1318, 2021.

[19] S. A. Khan, Z. Saeed, A. Khan, G. Hamid, and S. W. Haider, “Assessment of soil liquefaction potential in defence housing authority, Karachi, Pakistan,” Int. J. Econ. Environ. Geol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 63–68, 2017.

[20] A. Marto and T. C. Soon, “Short review on liquefaction susceptibility,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 2, pp. 2115–2119, May–Jun. 2012.

[21] U. C. Erginag, “A Parametric Investigation Study By Numerical Analysis on the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Numerical Analysis on the,” Feb. 2017.

[22] T. L. Youd and I. M. Idriss, “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils,” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 297–313, 2001.

[23] R. Bilham, S. Lodi, S. Hough, S. Bukhary, A. M. Khan, and S. F. A. Rafeeqi, “Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: Uncertain past, uncertain future,” Seismol. Res. Lett., vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 601– 613, 2007.

[24] R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, R. E. S. Moss, A. M. Kammerer, J. Wu, J. M. Pestana, M. F. Riemer, R. B. Sancio, J. D. Bray, R. E. Kayen, and A. Faris, “Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A unified and consistent framework,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, (Long Beach, CA, USA), pp. 1–71, American Society of Civil Engineers, Apr. 2003.

[25] P. Oktarina, F. Fikri, and I. Istiarto, “Correlation of excess pore water pressure ratio on flow liquefaction phenomenon in Sibalaya – Central Sulawesi Province,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 429, p. 04013, 2023.

[26] J. K. Mitchell, “Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands,” in Proc. From Res. to Pract. Geotech. Eng. Congr. 2008, vol. 325, pp. 433–451, 2008.

[27] F. Yi and R. J. Johnson, “Case study of liquefaction mitigation by compaction grouting,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Geotech. Geophys. Site Characterization (ISC6), 2021. Art. no. ISC2020-368.

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Liquefaction Hazard Assessment with Integrated Deterministic and Performance-Based Approach for Coastal Megacities: A Case Study of Karachi, Pakistan. (2026). Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 45(4), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.22581/0958

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.