Design and fabrication of an indigenous confined bubble column: Investigation of single bubble ascent
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.0053Keywords:
Gas-liquid interaction, Confined bubble column, Shadowgraphy, Single bubble, Terminal velocityAbstract
In Chemical Process Industries (CPIs) like petrochemicals, biochemicals, and pharmaceuticals, gas-liquid interactions are crucial. Bubble columns are preferred for their low maintenance, absence of moving parts, and efficient mass transfer and mixing. Liquid phases in such systems often shift from Newtonian to non-Newtonian behavior, as seen in materials like molasses, cooking oil, and microalgae, affecting hydrodynamic parameters like gas holdup, mixing time and mass transfer. This study investigated single-bubble dynamics using an Indigenous confined bubble column (6 × 240 × 1140 mm³) in water (Newtonian) and CarboxyMethyl Cellulose (CMC) solutions (non-Newtonian) at 1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L. The shadowgraphy technique measured bubble size, terminal velocity, Reynolds number, bubble count, and trajectory. In water, bubbles measured 1.48 mm, with sizes increasing to 1.87 mm and 2.08 mm in 2 g/L and 3 g/L CMC due to higher viscosity delaying detachment. Terminal velocity was 0.22 m/s in water, dropping to 0.11 m/s, 0.107 m/s, and 0.088 m/s in 1 g/L, 2 g/L, and 3 g/L CMC, respectively. Reynolds numbers declined sharply from 335.2 in water to 31.5, 7.9, and 3.5 in CMC solutions, reflecting viscosity's inverse effect. Bubble count increased from 7 per frame in water to 14, 15, and 17 in CMC solutions, as lower terminal velocity prolonged bubble presence. Trajectories were zigzag in water but remained rectilinear in CMC solutions across all concentrations. These findings highlight rheology's significant impact on bubble behavior, which will be essential for optimising process parameters in various CPIs.
Downloads
References
A. Esmaeili, C. Guy, and J. Chaouki, “The effects of liquid phase rheology on the hydrodynamics of a gas-liquid bubble column reactor”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 129, pp. 193–207, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.01.071
S. Almani, W. Blel, E. Gadoin, and C. Gentric, “Investigation of single bubbles rising in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids inside a thin-gap bubble column intended for microalgae cultivation”, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 167, pp. 218–230, Mar. 2021.
S. Almani, W. Blel, E. Gadoin, and C. Gentric, “Global characterization of hydrodynamics and gas-liquid mass transfer in a thin-gap bubble column in presence of Newtonian or non-Newtonian liquid phase”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 282, no. September, p. 119291, 2023.
C. Thobie, E. Gadoin, W. Blel, J. Pruvost, and C. Gentric, “Global characterization of hydrodynamics and gas-liquid mass transfer in a thin-gap bubble column intended for microalgae cultivation”, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 122, pp. 76–89, 2017.
M. Asim et al., “Isolated bubble ascent in a non-Newtonian media inside an infinite bubble column: a CFD study”, Brazilian J. Chem. Eng., no. 0123456789, 2023.
A. Haydar, W. Blel, H. Marec, and C. Gentric, “Gas Holdup and Flow Regimes in a Thin-Gap Bubble Column with Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Liquid Phase”, Chem. Eng. Technol., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1218–1227, 2023.
K. Loubière and G. Hébrard, “Influence of liquid surface tension (surfactants) on bubble formation at rigid and flexible orifices”, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1361–1369, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2004.03.009
G. Besagni and F. Inzoli, “The effect of liquid phase properties on bubble column fluid dynamics : Gas holdup , flow regime transition , bubble size distributions and shapes , interfacial areas and foaming phenomena”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 170, pp. 270–296, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.03.043
P. Pan, S. J. Li, H. L. Wei, X. B. Zhang, and Z. H. Luo, “Bubble columns with internals: A review on research methodology and process intensification”, Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif., vol. 209, no. November 2024, p. 110156, 2025.
P. Luty, M. Prończuk, and K. Bizon, “Experimental verification of different approaches for the determination of gas bubble equivalent diameter from optical imaging”, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 185, pp. 210–222, 2022.
S. Liu et al., “Effects of internals on macroscopic fluid dynamics in a bubble column”, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., vol. 77, pp. 19–29, 2025.
V. V. Ranade, S. Marchini, R. Kipping, N. V. Ranade, and M. Schubert, “Estimation of gas hold-up in bubble columns using wall pressure fluctuations and machine learning”, Chem. Eng. J., vol. 500, no. October, p. 157078, 2024.
Z. Yao et al., “Effects of gas distributor on hydrodynamics in gas–liquid bubble column by visual experiments and CFD simulations”, Chem. Eng. J., vol. 504, no. September 2024, p. 158476, 2025.
M. W. Abdulrahman, “Modeling gas holdup in a multiphase oxygen slurry bubble column reactor for Cu-Cl hydrogen production using CFD”, Results Eng., vol. 24, no. September, p. 102955, 2024.
H. Khan, P. Kováts, K. Zähringer, and R. Rzehak, “Experimental and numerical investigation of a counter-current flow bubble column”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 285, no. October 2023, 2024.
I. A. Evdokimenko et al., “Experimental and numerical study of wall phenomena of confined bubble flow in a square channel”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 301, no. September 2024, 2025.
D. D. Mcclure, N. Aboudha, J. M. Kavanagh, D. F. Fletcher, and G. W. Barton, “Mixing in bubble column reactors : Experimental study and CFD modeling”, Chem. Eng. J., vol. 264, pp. 291–301, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.090
M. Zedníková, S. Orvalho, M. Fialová, and M. C. Ruzicka, “Measurement of volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns”, ChemEngineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering2020019
N. Garci and F. Garci, “Mixing in bubble column and airlift reactors ´”, vol. 82, no. October, pp. 1367–1374, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1205/cerd.82.10.1367.46742
C. Thobie, E. Gadoin, W. Blel, J. Pruvost, and C. Gentric, “Chemical Engineering & Processing : Process Intensification Global characterization of hydrodynamics and gas-liquid mass transfer in a thin-gap bubble column intended for microalgae cultivation.”, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 122, no. July, pp. 76–89, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.10.009
W.D Deckwer, Bubble Column Reactors. Wiley. New York, 1991.
N. Kantarci, F. Borak, and K. O. Ulgen, “Bubble column reactors”, Process Biochem., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2263–2283, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.004
R. Krishna and J. M. van Baten, “Scaling up bubble column reactor with the aid of cfd”, IChemE, vol. 79, Part A, no. April, pp. 283–309, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1205/026387601750281815
M. Berovič, T. Koloini, E. S. Olsvik, and B. Kristiansen, “Rheological and morphological properties of submerged citric acid fermentation broth in stirred-tank and bubble column reactors”, Chem. Eng. J. Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 53, no. 2, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(93)85009-K
L. Böhm and M. Kraume, “Fluid dynamics of bubble swarms rising in Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids in flat sheet membrane systems”, J. Memb. Sci., vol. 475, pp. 533–544, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.003
A. Souliès, J. Pruvost, J. Legrand, C. Castelain, and T. I. Burghelea, “Rheological properties of suspensions of the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris at various volume fractions”, Rheol. Acta, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 589–605, Jun. 2013.
A. Souliès, J. Pruvost, J. Legrand, C. Castelain, and T. I. Burghelea, “Rheological properties of suspensions of the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris at various volume fractions”, Rheol. Acta, pp. 1–6, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0700-z
J. Pruvost, F. Le Borgne, A. Artu, and J. Legrand, “Development of a thin-film solar photobioreactor with high biomass volumetric productivity (AlgoFilm©) based on process intensification principles”, Algal Res., vol. 21, pp. 120–137, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.10.012
M. van Sint Annaland, N. G. Deen, and J. A. M. Kuipers, “Numerical simulation of gas bubbles behaviour using a three-dimensional volume of fluid method”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2999–3011, Jun. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.01.031
T. A. Pimenta and J. B. L. M. Campos, “Heat transfer coefficients from Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids flowing in laminar regime in a helical coil”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 58, no. 1–2, pp. 676–690, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.078
R. Clift, J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber, Bubbles, drops and particles. NY: Academic Press, 1978.
K. Dewsbury, D. Karamanev, and A. Margaritis, “Hydrodynamic characteristics of free rise of light solid particles and gas bubbles in non-Newtonian liquids”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 54, no. 21, pp. 4825–4830, Nov. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00200-6
Z. Yujie, L. Mingyan, X. Yonggui, and T. Can, “Three-dimensional volume of fluid simulations on bubble formation and dynamics in bubble columns”, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 73, pp. 55–78, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.01.012
S. Almani, W. Blel, E. Gadoin, and C. Gentric, “CFD simulation of isolated bubbles rising in Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids inside a thin-gap bubble column”, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 214, no. December 2024, pp. 202–218, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Sumera Dero , Abdul Rehman Nangraj , Mustafa Abbas Fadhel , Radiative MHD flow and heat transfer characteristics of Cu-Fe3O4 /blood base hybridized nanofluid through stenotic artery , Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2025): April Issue
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.