MUET logo

Performance-Based Multi-Criteria Assessment of Low-Carbon Social Housing: A Comparative Life Cycle Analysis in the Climatic Context of Sindh, Pakistan

Authors

  • Ali Raza Khoso

    Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author

  • Muhammad Saleem Raza

    Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author

  • Sajan Laghari

    Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author

  • Sarfraz Hyder

    Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.0796

Keywords:

Social Housing, Low-Cost Housing, Embodied Carbon, Life Cycle Assessment, AHP-TOPSIS, Sustainability

Abstract

The housing sector in Pakistan has a documented backlog of 10.3 million units resulting from multiple social and economic challenges. The crisis is particularly severe in Sindh Province because of extreme climatic conditions and the vulnerability of informal settlements. This situation requires a robust engineering approach to deliver housing that is both resilient and affordable. Accordingly, a paradigm shift is needed to reconcile cost sensitivity with low-carbon sustainability. This study addresses this need by developing an optimized housing model based on standardized life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. A hybrid decision-support tool combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was developed. In total, 13 alternative materials and 14 construction strategies were evaluated against environmental, economic, and technical criteria. Qualitative insights from industry professionals were cross-validated for consistency and statistical significance using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W), whereas the quantitative assessment comprised a cradle-to-gate embodied-carbon inventory and standardized cost modeling. The findings indicate that compressed stabilized earth blocks (CSEBs) and precast roofing form the optimal configuration for the local context. Compared with a conventional brick structure, the proposed design reduced embodied emissions by 30% and construction costs by 13%. Strong expert consensus (W = 0.82, p < 0.001) also supported the model's implementation feasibility. The study therefore presents an actionable pathway for resilient and affordable housing by integrating rigorous decision-support tools with locally measured environmental, economic, and technical performance. It also contributes to the achievement of UN Sustainable Development Goals 9, 11, and 13.

Downloads

References

[1] “World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities | UN-Habitat.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2022-envisaging-the-future-of-cities

[2] M. Marzouk and S. Azab, “Analyzing sustainability in low-income housing projects using system dynamics,” Energy Build., vol. 134, pp. 143–153, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2016.10.034.

[3] V. W. Y. Tam, “Cost Effectiveness of using Low Cost Housing Technologies in Construction,” Procedia Eng., vol. 14, pp. 156–160, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG.2011.07.018.

[4] S. Malik and M. Nurunnabi, “Stakeholders’ perspective on collaboration barriers in low-income housing provision: a case study from pakistan,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1057/S41599-023-02583-0;SUBJMETA.

[5] A. J. Sindhu, “The Concept of Affordability and the Affordable Housing in Pakistan,” J. Archit. Built Environ. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.51846/JABER.V1I2.3048.

[6] HBFC, “The state of housing affordability in Pakistan,” 2024. Accessed: Oct. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hbfc.com.pk/the-state-of-housing-affordability-in-sindh-a-regional-analysis/

[7] A. Moghayedi, B. O. Awuzie, and A. Mehmood, “Evaluating the sustainability performance of sustainable, innovative, and affordable housing,” Int. Plan. Stud., Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/13563475.2025.2550970.

[8] A. Kumar, T. H. Ali, R. Kumar, W. Rattar, and M. Ali, “Developing sustainable burnt clay bricks incorporating agro-industrial waste,” Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 47–61, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.22581/muet1982.0072.

[9] T. Lützkendorf and M. Balouktsi, “Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations,” Build. Cities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 964–973, 2022, doi: 10.5334/BC.257.

[10] Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. 2023. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.

[11] Y. Zhang, S. Sattar, and D. T. Cook, “Systematic Review of Embodied Carbon Assessment and Reduction in Building Life Cycles An Integrated Approach to Resilience and Sustainability,” 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1324.

[12] A. Thennarasan Latha, B. Murugesan, and B. S. Thomas, “Compressed Stabilized Earth Block Incorporating Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Bottom Ash as a Partial Replacement for Fine Aggregates,” Build. 2023, Vol. 13, Page 1114, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 1114, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS13051114.

[13] H. Hafez, D. El-Mahdy, and A. T. M. Marsh, “Barriers and enablers for scaled-up adoption of compressed earth blocks in Egypt,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 783–797, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2023.2237133;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL.

[14] P. Samrani, Y. Cao, G. Fimbres-Weihs, E. Sanjaya, and A. Abbas, “Effect of fly ash and ground waste glass as cement replacement in concrete 3D-Printing for sustainable construction,” Front. Built Environ., vol. 10, p. 1430174, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3389/FBUIL.2024.1430174/BIBTEX.

[15] Y. Ji et al., “Improving the performance of prefabricated houses through multi-objective optimization design,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 84, p. 108579, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.108579.

[16] R. O’Hegarty, A. McCarthy, J. O’hagan, T. Thanapornpakornsin, S. Raffoul, and O. Kinnane, “Understanding the embodied carbon credentials of modern methods of construction,” Build. Cities, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 70–89, 2025, doi: 10.5334/BC.515.

[17] T. P. Sah, A. W. Lacey, H. Hao, and W. Chen, “Prefabricated concrete sandwich and other lightweight wall panels for sustainable building construction: State-of-the-art review,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 89, p. 109391, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.109391.

[18] D. L. Le, R. Salomone, Q. T. Nguyen, A. Versele, and C. Piccardo, “Status and barriers to circular bio-based building material adoption in developed economies: The case of Flanders, Belgium,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 367, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121965.

[19] UN Habitant, “Envisaging the Future of Cities,” 2022. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf

[20] A. Moghayedi et al., “A Critical Success Factor Framework for Implementing Sustainable Innovative and Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11080317.

[21] S. P. Tissaveerasinghe, N. Chathuranga, and C. Siriwardana, “Compressed stabilised earth blocks as a sustainable building material: investigation of customer purchase intentions,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 808–826, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-06-2024-0144.

[22] X. L. Castillo, V. Yepes, X. L. Castillo, and V. Yepes, “Multi-Criteria Decision Methods in the evaluation of social housing projects,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 608–630, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2025.24425.

[23] A. R. Khoso and A. Md Yusof, “Extended Review on Contractor Selection in Construction Projects,” Can. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 771–789, 2020, doi: 10.1139/cjce-2019-0258.

[24] M. M. Alam Bhuiyan and A. Hammad, “A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043128.

[25] J. Stofkova, M. Krejnus, K. R. Stofkova, P. Malega, and V. Binasova, “Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141811546.

[26] S. A. Khan, A. Chaabane, and F. T. Dweiri, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Application in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review,” Multi-Criteria Methods Tech. Appl. to Supply Chain Manag., Jun. 2018, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.74067.

[27] A. Jahan, F. Mustapha, Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and M. Bahraminasab, “A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection,” Mater. Des., vol. 32, pp. 1215–1221, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015.

[28] J. Bredenoord and Y. Kulshreshtha, “Compressed Stabilized Earthen Blocks and Their Use in Low-Cost Social Housing,” Sustain. 2023, Vol. 15, Page 5295, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 5295, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/SU15065295.

[29] J. R. González-López, C. A. Juárez-Alvarado, B. Ayub-Francis, and J. M. Mendoza-Rangel, “Compaction effect on the compressive strength and durability of stabilized earth blocks,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 163, pp. 179–188, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.12.074.

[30] D. K. Nayak, P. P. Abhilash, R. Singh, R. Kumar, and V. Kumar, “Fly ash for sustainable construction: A review of fly ash concrete and its beneficial use case studies,” Clean. Mater., vol. 6, p. 100143, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CLEMA.2022.100143.

[31] D. C. Sekhar and S. Nayak, “Utilization of granulated blast furnace slag and cement in the manufacture of compressed stabilized earth blocks,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 166, pp. 531–536, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.01.125.

[32] S. Im et al., “Multi-scale synchrotron X-ray scattering studies on thermo-induced changes in structural and mechanical properties of CSH/PCE composites,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 459, p. 139742, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139742.

[33] J. Wei, B. Ge, Y. Zhong, T. L. Lee, and Y. Zhang, “Comparative analysis of embodied carbon in modular and conventional construction methods in Hong Kong,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1038/S41598-024-73906-7;SUBJMETA.

[34] C. Z. Li, V. W. Tam, M. Ma, and S. Wen, “Carbon emission analysis and multi-objective optimization of modular integrated construction using petri net simulation,” Energy Build., vol. 339, p. 115784, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2025.115784.

[35] M. A. Mohammed, I. M. Budaiwi, M. A. Al-Osta, and A. A. Abdou, “Thermo-Environmental Performance of Modular Building Envelope Panel Technologies: A Focused Review,” Build. 2024, Vol. 14, Page 917, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 917, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS14040917.

[36] I. G. N. Anuradha, B. A. K. S. Perera, and H. Mallawarachchi, “Embodied carbon and cost analysis to identify the most appropriate wall materials for buildings: Whole life cycle approach,” in MERCon 2018 - 4th International Multidisciplinary Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Jul. 2018, pp. 43–48. doi: 10.1109/MERCon.2018.8421911.

[37] Y. S. Marzouk, E. El-sherbiny, and T. Refaat, “Results in Engineering The architecture design checklist of classrooms for children with cochlear implant in rehabilitation centers,” Results Eng., vol. 22, no. April, p. 102175, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102175.

[38] John W Creswell; Vicky L Plano Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842

[39] F. Soomro, S. Kalwar, I. A. Memon, and A. B. Kalwar, “Accessibility Factor for Boulevard Shopping Mall ,” Int. Res. J. Innov. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 19–22, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://irjiet.com/common_src/article_file/1634368153_957fb6a03c_5_irjiet.pdf

[40] A. R. Khoso, A. M. Yusof, S. H. Khahro, N. I. A. B. Abidin, and N. A. Memon, “Automated two-stage continuous decision support model using exploratory factor analysis-MACBETH-SMART: an application of contractor selection in public sector construction,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., no. 0123456789, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03186-w.

[41] I. Rafikul and S. Thomas L., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Transportation Sector,” in 19th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, M. Beckmann and H. P. Künzi, Eds., Auckland: Springer, 2008, pp. 79–91.

[42] A. Field, Discovering Statistics using SPSS, Third. London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: Sage Publications, 2009.

[43] P. Varun Raj, P. Surya Teja, K. Sai Siddhartha, and J. S. Kalyana Rama, “Housing with low-cost materials and techniques for a sustainable construction in India-A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 43, pp. 1850–1855, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.10.816.

[44] V. Puri, P. Chakrabortty, S. Anand, and S. Majumdar, “Bamboo reinforced prefabricated wall panels for low cost housing,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 9, pp. 52–59, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2016.11.010.

[45] P. G. Hammond, C. Jones, E. F. Lowrie, and P. Tse, “A BSRIA guide Embodied Carbon The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE),” 2010. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/sert/embodied/.

[46] J. Jayawardana, G. Zhang, A. K. Kulatunga, M. Sandanayake, and J. A. S. C. Jayasinghe, “Life cycle sustainability assessment for modular construction - A proposed conceptual framework,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1101, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/4/042039.

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 3 (2026): July Issue

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Performance-Based Multi-Criteria Assessment of Low-Carbon Social Housing: A Comparative Life Cycle Analysis in the Climatic Context of Sindh, Pakistan. (2026). Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 45(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.0796

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

51-60 of 76

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.