MUET logo

CFD-Based Comparative Analysis of Hydronic Piping Layouts for Radiant Cooling System

Authors

  • Samiullah Qureshi

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro.
    Author

  • Afaque Ahmed Bhutto

    Department of Mathematics, The University of Larkano, Larkana, 77150, Pakistan
    Author

  • Intizar Ali Tunio

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro.
    Author

  • Rizwan Ahmed Memon

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro.
    Author

  • Abdul Ghafoor Memon

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro.
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22581/0662

Keywords:

Energy Consumption, Radiant Cooling System, Hydronic Piping Layouts, Pressure Drop, Pumping Power, Cost Optimization

Abstract

The radiant cooling system has been reported as energy energy-efficient and cost-effective alternative to conventional air-conditioning. However, limited research has been conducted to evaluate the impact of different piping configurations on the thermal and cost performance of the RC system. In this work, the influence of three common hydronic piping configurations, serpentine, canopy-to-canopy, and tree-shaped, on the thermal, energy, and cost of RC systems is investigated. In this regard, piping layouts are modelled and simulated for similar operational conditions using Ansys Fluent. The steady-state, two-dimensional turbulence model is used to evaluate temperature distribution, pressure drop, and cooling capacity of the system. The results show that tree-shaped layout shows the best temperature distribution and the highest capacity-to-pumping ratio of 1.61. Conversely, the ratio for serpentine and canopy-to-canopy layouts was significantly lower at 0.055 and 1.43, respectively. The results further show that the pressure drop for serpentine layout was 14% and 97% higher than that for canopy-to-canopy and tree-shaped layouts, respectively. In the case of canopy-to-canopy layout, cooling capacity was slightly higher while the temperature distribution was non-uniform. The analysis show that the cost of piping in the tree-shaped layout is approximately 16% lower. Furthermore, the tree-shaped layout also requires less energy for circulating the water, lowering costs by 14% and 97% relative to canopy-to-canopy and serpentine layouts, respectively. Overall, the tree-shaped layout offers a better performance in terms of temperature uniformity, energy consumption, and cost, making it the most suitable layout choice for RC systems.

Downloads

References

[1] S. Qureshi, R. A. Memon, A. G. Memon, and S. Kumar, “Energy and Cost-Saving Potential of the Radiant Cooling System for a City in Pakistan,” in International Conference on Innovation, Sustainability, and Applied Sciences, C. Pon Selvan, N. Sehgal, S. Ruhela, and N. U. Rizvi, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 61–67.

[2] K. Dharmasastha, S. M. S. Nagendra, and M. P. Maiya, “Hydronic flow path analysis on the thermal comfort performance of radiant cooling system,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 39, p. 101727, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.TSEP.2023.101727.

[3] L. Ye, G. Lv, and Y. Ding, “Structure optimization of radiant cooling panel: A literature review and assessment,” Energy Build., vol. 310, p. 114097, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2024.114097.

[4] N. Aste, C. del Pero, and F. Leonforte, “Water flat plate PV–thermal collectors: A review,” Solar Energy, vol. 102, pp. 98–115, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2014.01.025.

[5] A. F. Miguel and L. A. O. Rocha, Tree-shaped fluid flow and heat transfer. Springer, 2018.

[6] A. Bejan, “Street network theory of organization in nature,” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 85–107, 1996.

[7] M. Mosa, M. Labat, and S. Lorente, “Role of flow architectures on the design of radiant cooling panels, a constructal approach,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 150, pp. 1345–1352, 2019.

[8] M. Mosa, M. Labat, and S. Lorente, “Constructal design of flow channels for radiant cooling panels,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 145, p. 106052, 2019.

[9] Samiullah, “Modelling and Simulation of Energy-Efficient and Cost-Effective Radiant Cooling System for Compatible Climatic Conditions,” Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro, Jamshoro, 2025.

[10] H. Ghaedamini, M. R. Salimpour, and A. S. Mujumdar, “The effect of svelteness on the bifurcation angles role in pressure drop and flow uniformity of tree-shaped microchannels,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 708–716, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.10.005.

[11] S. Kumar et al., “Numerical investigation of the velocity and spreading characteristics of non-circular turbulent jets at different Reynolds numbers,” Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 84–93, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1139/tcsme-2023-0028.

[12] K.-N. Rhee, B. W. Olesen, and K. W. Kim, “Ten questions about radiant heating and cooling systems,” Build. Environ., vol. 112, pp. 367–381, 2017.

[13] M. Umar, “CoolMax Group of Companies,” Personal communication, 2023.

[14] Supply House, “Supply House - Online Store.” Accessed: Apr. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.supplyhouse.com/Wirsbo-Uponor-F1040750-3-4-AQUAPEX-100-ft-coil-2174000-p

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 2 (2026): April Issue

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

CFD-Based Comparative Analysis of Hydronic Piping Layouts for Radiant Cooling System. (2026). Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 45(2), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.22581/0662

Similar Articles

31-40 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.