MUET logo

Aspen HYSYS-based Modeling of Liquefied Natural Gas Production from an Indigenous Natural Gas Source

Authors

  • Inamullah Maitlo

    Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Safdar Ali

    Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Sadam Ali Khichi

    Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Imran Ali

    Department of Environmental Sciences, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Ghulamullah Maitlo

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author
  • Imran Nazir Unar

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22581/0504

Keywords:

Modeling, Liquefied natural gas, Aspen HYSYS, Simulation, Resources

Abstract

Pakistan is currently facing a serious energy shortage due to a lack of domestic technology and local expertise in key engineering fields. Pakistan contains rich natural gas reserves. Most natural gas contains a high percentage of light hydrocarbons and low percentages of carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Natural gas liquids are hydrocarbons that alter the hydrocarbon dew point (HCDP) of natural gas. Therefore, to raise the hydrocarbon dew points and generate revenue, these hydrocarbon dew points must be removed before further transportation. In this study, a steady-state, single-stage industrial process model was developed to remove natural gas liquids (NGLs) from natural gas. Process flow diagrams (PFDs) for two ISS configurations, the turbine expander (TE) and the gas subcooling process (GSCP), are integrated into the Aspen HYSYS V10 standard process simulator. The program uses the Peng-Robinson formula of state as the fluid package. The performance of the two processes was evaluated based on three different natural gas sources: Sohi, Qadirpur, and Zamzam. Based on feed composition. The effects of feed flow rate, input temperature, and pressure were studied. An economic and cost assessment of these two operations was also performed. The HHV values of NGL generated from Qadirpur, Zamzama, and Sui gas in TE configuration are 1.38 ×106, 1.51×106 and 2.3×106KJ/kgmole KJ/kg.mol, respectively. The HHV values of the return gas in TE configuration at Qadirpur, Zamzama, and Sui were estimated to be 7.68×105, 6.78×105, and 8.53×105KJ/kg.mol, respectively. Feed pressure significantly affects the production of natural gas liquids and electricity requirements. It was noticed that the production of NGL increased non-linearly with increasing input pressure. The GSCP configuration led by Sui shows the highest capital cost of $12.1 million, while the TE configuration led by Zamzama shows the lowest capital cost of $11.4 million.

Downloads

References

[1] V. Litvinenko, "The role of hydrocarbons in the global energy agenda: The focus on liquefied natural gas," Resources, vol. 9, p. 59, 2020.

[2] M. Kiamansouri, "Integration of renewable energy sources in oil and gas operations a sustainable future," Eurasian Journal of Chemical, Medicinal and Petroleum Research, vol. 4, pp. 63-87, 2025.

[3] F. Al Mubarak, R. Rezaee, and D. A. Wood, "Economic, societal, and environmental impacts of available energy sources: A review," Eng, vol. 5, pp. 1232-1265, 2024.

[4] M. J. Economides and D. A. Wood, "The state of natural gas," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 1-13, 2009.

[5] I. N. Unar, I. Maitlo, S. Ali, S. Y. Khan, M. K. Riaz, S. Ali, et al., "Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Released from the Petroleum Refinery Industry using Mathematical Modelling with Aspen HYSYS," Journal of Sustainable Environment, vol. 3, pp. 16-30, 2024.

[6] R. L. Kleinberg, "Oil and natural gas, present, and in the future," in Energy and Climate Change, ed: Elsevier, 2025, pp. 123-151.

[7] J. Henry, "Expanding Circular Bioeconomy and Carbon Sequestration in British Columbia," Royal Roads University (Canada), 2024.

[8] О. Izriadnova, S. Tsukhlo, Е. Iluykhina, Y. Bobylev, N. Karlova, V. Uzun, et al., "Section 4. The Real Sector of the Economy," Russian Economy: Trends and Perspectives, pp. 187-306, 2012.

[9] Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Zhang, and Y. Qiu, "A Study on US Natural Gas Exports and Global Trade Changes Under the Context of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict," Available at SSRN 5138410, 2024.

[10] D. Helmig, S. Rossabi, J. Hueber, P. Tans, S. A. Montzka, K. Masarie, et al., "Reversal of global atmospheric ethane and propane trends largely due to US oil and natural gas production," Nature Geoscience, vol. 9, pp. 490-495, 2016.

[11] T. Kopac, "Emerging applications of process intensification for enhanced separation and energy efficiency, environmentally friendly sustainable adsorptive separations: A review," International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 45, pp. 15839-15856, 2021.

[12] M. A. Qyyum, K. Qadeer, J. Haider, and M. Lee, "Nitrogen self-recuperation expansion-based process for offshore coproduction of liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and pentane plus," Applied Energy, vol. 235, pp. 247-257, 2019.

[13] D. Hadzihafizovic, "Introduction to natural gas plant LPG Technology 2," Available at SSRN, 2025.

[14] C. T. Alves, J. A. Onwudili, P. Ghorbannezhad, and S. Kumagai, "A review of the thermochemistries of biomass gasification and utilisation of gas products," Sustainable Energy & Fuels, vol. 7, pp. 3505-3540, 2023.

[15] A. AlNouss, M. Ibrahim, and S. A. Al-Sobhi, "Potential energy savings and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions reduction strategy for natural gas liquid (NGL) recovery: Process simulation and economic evaluation," Journal of cleaner production, vol. 194, pp. 525-539, 2018.

[16] D. B. Bosman, Q. Li, and A. A. Kiss, "Enhanced downstream processing of NGL using intensified fluid separation technologies," Energy, vol. 296, 2024.

[17] B. R. Young, D. B. Viet, T. G. Walmsley, N. N. Tran, J. Tanner, P. A Bahri, et al., "Circular Systems Engineering: Integrating Process Systems Engineering and Circular Economy for Sustainable Transitions."

[18] L. Wang, Z. Yang, S. Sharma, A. Mian, T.-E. Lin, G. Tsatsaronis, et al., "A review of evaluation, optimization and synthesis of energy systems: methodology and application to thermal power plants," Energies, vol. 12, p. 73, 2018.

[19] Aspentech, User Guide Manual for Aspen Physical Property V10. Cambridge, MA.: Aspen Technology, Inc., 2018.

[20] M. Getu, S. Mahadzir, Y. Samyudia, M. S. Khan, A. Bahadori, and M. Lee, "Risk-based optimization for representative natural gas liquid (NGL) recovery processes by considering uncertainty from the plant inlet," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 42-54, 2015.

[21] I. N. Unar, S. A. Soomro, S. Aziz, A. R. Memon, and K. M. Qureshi, "A promising technology of pressure into power: A case study of pressure into power approach in gas transmission lines in Pakistan," in Energy, environment and sustainable development, ed: Springer, 2011, pp. 99-109.

[22] I. N. Unar, A. Aftab, and M. Abro, "Estimation of power production potential from natural gas pressure reduction stations in Pakistan using ASPEN HYSYS," Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 34, pp. 301-308, 2015.

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Aspen HYSYS-based Modeling of Liquefied Natural Gas Production from an Indigenous Natural Gas Source. (2026). Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 45(1), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.22581/0504

Similar Articles

21-30 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.