logo

Assessment of the impact of different weave geometries on the crimp factor of woven preforms made from high-performance carbon filaments

Authors

  • Sanam Irum Memon

    Department of Textile Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author
  • Abdul Wahab Memon

    Department of Textile Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author
  • Umaima Saleem Memon

    Department of Textile Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author
  • Nadir Ali

    Department of Textile Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.3383

Keywords:

Weave designs, Crimp factor, High-performance carbon-preforms, Technical textiles, Composites

Abstract

Crimp, also known as fabric waviness, is a key factor affecting weaving efficiency and the performance characteristics of woven fabrics, especially high-performance fabrics. Increased crimp typically enhances yarn interlocking, thereby improving the structural stability of the fabric. The added friction between yarns boosts resistance to distortion and slippage, which is crucial for maintaining the fabric's shape during use and subsequent processing. However, excessive crimp can reduce the mechanical symmetry of the fabric and, in demanding applications such as composite materials, compromise its dimensional stability under stress. Producing composite preforms with minimal crimp while ensuring improved structural integrity remains a significant challenge. Crimp levels can be adjusted by employing different weave patterns while keeping the fabric-making parameters constant. In high-performance applications like composites, the reduced crimp is preferred for better load distribution and material strength, making non-crimp woven textiles a favorable option. Advanced automated processes are typically employed to produce non-crimp woven preforms, including three-dimensional (3D) woven preforms with three sets of interlocked yarns or uni-directional woven preforms. This research uses conventional two-dimensional (2D) weaving techniques to fabricate high-performance composite materials. Experimental studies were conducted on various basic weave patterns to produce high-performance carbon woven preforms using advanced 2D weaving machines (Dobby shedding). The findings demonstrate that the weave design significantly influences the crimp in carbon woven preforms. The crimp percentage (C%) was calculated as the ratio of the un-crimped length of the tow to its crimped length. The study revealed that the crimp in both warp and weft tows of the woven preform varies notably based on the weave design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Mankodi and D. Chudasama, “Effect of Non-Crimp Fabric Structure on Mechanical Properties of Laminates”, 17th International Conference on Textile Composite Material and Processes, NY, waste publication, 2015.

N. V. Padaki, R. Alagirusamy, B. Deopura, and R. Fangueiro, “Influence of preform interlacement on the low velocity impact behavior of multilayer textile composites”, Journal of industrial textiles, vol. 40, pp. 171-185, 2010.

J. Rong, B. Sun, H. Hu, and B. Gu, “Tensile impact behavior of multiaxial multilayer warp knitted (MMWK) fabric reinforced composites”, Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, vol. 25, pp. 1305-1315, 2006.

K. Bilisik, “Two-dimensional (2D) fabrics and three-dimensional (3D) preforms for ballistic and stabbing protection: A review”, Textile Research Journal, vol. 87, pp. 2275-2304, 2017.

M. Kashif, S. T. A. Hamdani, Y. Nawab, M. A. Asghar, M. Umair, and K. Shaker, “Optimization of 3D woven preform for improved mechanical performance”, Journal of Industrial Textiles, vol. 48, pp. 1206-1227, 2019.

J. Pazmino, V. Carvelli, S. Lomov, and I. Verpoest, “Forming of a Non-Crimp 3D Orthogonal Weave E-Glass Composite Reinforcement”, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 554, pp. 433-440, 2013.

H. Yi and X. Ding, “Conventional approach on manufacturing 3D woven preforms used for composites”, Journal of industrial textiles, vol. 34, pp. 39-50, 2004.

V. Carvelli and S. V. Lomov, Fatigue of textile composites: Elsevier, 2015.

T. Hamouda, “Complex three-dimensional-shaped knitting preforms for composite application”, Journal of Industrial Textiles, vol. 46, pp. 1536-1551, 2017.

C. Meola, S. Boccardi, and G. M. Carlomagno, Infrared thermography in the evaluation of aerospace composite materials: infrared thermography to composites: Woodhead Publishing, 2016.

Y. Shi and B. Wang, “Mechanical properties of carbon fiber/cellulose composite papers modified by hot-melting fibers”, Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, vol. 24, pp. 56-60, 2014.

T.-W. Chou, L. Gao, E. T. Thostenson, Z. Zhang, and J.-H. Byun, “An assessment of the science and technology of carbon nanotube-based fibers and composites”, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 70, pp. 1-19, 2010.

X. Zhang, X. Pei, Q. Jia, and Q. Wang, “Effects of carbon fiber surface treatment on the tribological properties of 2D woven carbon fabric/polyimide composites”, Applied Physics A, vol. 95, pp. 793-799, 2009.

M. Ghazimoradi, N. Naouar, V. Carvelli, and P. Boisse, “Numerical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of tetraxial technical textiles”, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 54, pp. 3632-3647, 2019.

F. Afroz and A. Siddika, “Effect of warp yarn tension on crimp% in woven fabric”, European scientific journal, vol. 10, 2014.

S. I. Memon, M. H. Peerzada, R. A. Jhatial, and R. F. A. Qureshi, “Modification of 2D conventional weaving machine for the fabrication of high performance woven preforms: Part-I: Design and manufacturing of warp creel”, Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 39, pp. 205-212, 2020.

Y. Mahadik and S. Hallett, “Effect of fabric compaction and yarn waviness on 3D woven composite compressive properties”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 42, pp. 1592-1600, 2011.

A. Siddika, N. N. Akter, M. Kowshik Saha, M. Islam, and M. Islam, “Effects of yarn count on crimp% and take-up% of 2/1 (S) Twill woven fabric”, Global Journal of Researches in Engineering (J), vol. 15, pp. 54-59, 2015.

W. Slaughter and N. Fleck, “Microbuckling of fiber composites with random initial fiber waviness”, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 42, pp. 1743-1766, 1994.

M. Saiman, M. Wahab, and M. Wahit, “The effect of fabric weave on the tensile strength of woven kenaf reinforced unsaturated polyester composite”, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in Textile Engineering, Fashion, Apparel and Design 2014 (ICTEFAD 2014), 2014, pp. 25-29.

L. Greve and A. K. Pickett, “Modelling damage and failure in carbon/epoxy non-crimp fabric composites including effects of fabric pre-shear”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 37, pp. 1983-2001, 2006.

A. Alavudeen, N. Rajini, S. Karthikeyan, M. Thiruchitrambalam, and N. Venkateshwaren, “Mechanical properties of banana/kenaf fiber-reinforced hybrid polyester composites: Effect of woven fabric and random orientation”, Materials & Design (1980-2015), vol. 66, pp. 246-257, 2015.

J. Bijwe and R. Rattan, “Influence of weave of carbon fabric in polyetherimide composites in various wear situations”, Wear, vol. 263, pp. 984-991, 2007.

J. Fan and L. Hunter, Engineering apparel fabrics and garments: Elsevier, 2009.

F. Ohlsson, “Weight reduction by optimized reinforcement structures”, Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport, ed: Elsevier, 2016, pp. 191-215.

G. Bibo, P. Hogg, and M. Kemp, “Mechanical characterisation of glass-and carbon-fibre-reinforced composites made with non-crimp fabrics”, Composites science and technology, vol. 57, pp. 1221-1241, 1997.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-09 — Updated on 2025-04-12

How to Cite

Assessment of the impact of different weave geometries on the crimp factor of woven preforms made from high-performance carbon filaments. (2025). Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 44(2), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.3383

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.